26 Jul 2023 9:11 am
Your point is taken. I agree that Turley's scholastic opinion is much, much closer to that of a Supreme Court justice than that of, say, Morning Joe....or Chuck Todd...and carries more authority.maineman » 26 Jul 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ an example: Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Antonin Scalia were both legal scholars, I am sure you would agree.
They were very good personal friends but rarely agreed on anything regarding legal opinions.
They both had well-reasoned opinions based on scholarship, which were usually diametrically opposed.
You like Turley's opinion? Bless your heart.
I don't.
See how that works?